"When you are inspired by some great purpose, some extraordinary project, all your thoughts break their bounds. Your mind transcends limitations, your consciousness expands in every direction, and you find yourself in a new, great and wonderful world. Dormant forces, faculties and talents come alive, and you discover yourself to be a greater person by far than you ever dreamt yourself to be." Maharishi Patanjali Yoga Sutra before 2200 years.
Sunday, December 21, 2014
INDIA’S FOREIGN POLICY by Ambassador Dinesh K Jain
@
IIT, Mandi
Professor
Timothy A Gonsalves,Director,
Dr.
Aniruddha Chakraborty,
Distinguished
Faculty Members,
Invited
Guests,
Future
engineering professionals andother students,
I
amhonoured and delighted to be here, today, among you all. My compliments to
youfor developing your IIT so rapidly, and in such a beautiful campus.
Yesterday,to witness your Foundation Day, to be a part of it, was truly a
privilege forme.
Until
afew weeks ago, I was unaware that the newest IIT had since been
established,here at Mandi. Then I discovered that it started its life at the
IIT Roorkeecampus which mentored it. This invoked in me a feeling of kinship
with you, forI am an alumnus of the University of Roorkee, precursor towhat
lately became IIT Roorkee.
Ministryof
External Affairs, Public Diplomacy Division, invited me initially, to visithere
under its Distinguished Lecture Series, to speak on India’s ForeignPolicy. This
suggests to me that I may well have the distinction of being thefirst to visit
here in that role. I thank the Ministry for the opportunity, andthank you all
for your warm hospitality and all kind courtesies.
I
will tryto present before you the origins, evolution, contours, and current
broad orientations of India’s foreign policy, and how we envision India in the
world in the comingyears, allnecessarily encapsulated and tailored to meet the
time available. You are mostwelcome to later address questions on any subjects
and issues of India’s foreignpolicy, whether touched upon or not in my
presentation. I would also be interested to hear your views and comments.
The
beginning of foreign relations in humanaffairs, and the need for foreign policy
to deal with them, is as old as theorganisation of human life in groups. Yet,
foreign policy, to the uninitiated,might appear somewhat esoteric. In simple
terms, it is a country’s policy,conceived, designed, and formulated, to
safeguard and promote her nationalinterests, in her external milieu, in the
conduct of relations with othercountries, bilaterally and multilaterally. It is
a direct reflection of a country’s traditional valuesand overall national
policies, her aspirations and self perception.
Its
salience stems from thefact that what happens outside, the externalenvironment,
has implications for the realisation of our national goals andobjectives. We
therefore need to make the ever-changing external environment conduciveto our
goals. But it is largely not in our control, and issubject to competition from
other states. Cooperation is therefore an importantfactor, for it is not
possible to secure one’s absolute goals; that would be atthe expense of all
others, and therefore not tenable or sustainable. Thiscooperation can be
anywhere on a full spectrum, from evolving certain minimalunderstanding, to
working together, and up to building alliances. It alsofollows that foreign
policy, too, cannot be static, but must necessarily bedynamic, evolving
pragmatically, though always within certain guidingparameters of paramount
salience.
The
two principal foreign policy goals of national interest aresecurity and
prosperity. While all would agree with this much, what the precisecontours of
these goals are, and how to go about it, within the limitedresources available,
is subject of a perennial national debate, oftencharacterized by much
dissension as well, but eventually founded on a broadnational consensus.
Ina
democratic polity, public policy-making results from the political and
otherinteractions of governmental and non-governmental individuals and groups.
Forforeign policy, three sources of input are of particular importance: the
executiveincluding the bureaucracy, the legislature, and the independent public
opinion includingthe media. The civil nuclear cooperation agreement with the US
was a readyvivid example of very active and extensive involvement of all three.
Theessence
of foreign policy is diplomatic negotiations and considerations, ratherthan
legislation, and therefore foreign policy falls outside the area of
directlinkage of responsibility with the electorate, and is formulated in the
firstplace by the bureaucracy, implying in our context the Prime Minister and
theCouncil of Ministers, especially the Minister of External Affairs, and
theadministrative apparatus – that is Ministry of External Affairs,along
with its outreach offices comprising embassies, consulates and others. The
current Minister is ShriSalmanKhurshid, assisted
by two Ministers ofState, Smt. Preneet Kaur and ShriE. Ahamed.The Foreign Secretary,
currently Smt. Sujatha Singh, is the
head of the Indian Foreign Service (IFS),
and as such first among thefour Secretaries in the Ministry, who share at the
helm all substantiveresponsibilities for the diplomatic conduct of India’s
foreign policy.
Foreign
policy transcends all various areas of interaction: political,strategic,
economic and commercial, scientific and technological, cultural,consular,
international law, and in today’s world ever newer subjects such ashuman
rights, larger social issues, women, youth, the disabled, media andinformation,
intellectual property, cyberspace, climate change, food, energy,health,
transport, labour, migration, as well as disarmament, and fight againstmenaces
like terrorism and drugs. As the globe continues to shrink, impelled
byunrelenting technological advances and information implosion, the
canvasinevitably grows ever bigger and wider.
Inmeeting
the external challenges, diplomacy is the first line of defense, and force- by
way of the military - the last resort. As such, diplomacy, and its
concomitant,tact, are the major instrument for conducting foreign policy and
promoting itsgoals, peacefully.
Canada’s
former Prime Minister Lester Pearson put it, tongue in cheek, “diplomacyis
letting someone else have your way”. Tact is also described as the artof making
a point without making an enemy. Or as awit said, “a diplomat is a man who
always remembers a woman's birthday butnever her age”. More seriously,
dictionaries define diplomacy as the ability to deal with others in touchy
situations without offendingthem. Foreign policy is a serious business,
withlittle room for sentimentality; President John F Kennedy said, “Thepurpose
of foreign policy is not to provide an outlet for our own sentiments ofhope or
indignation; it is to shape real events in a real world.”
In
the Indian context, historically,Hanuman was possibly the first envoy when he
was sent to Ravan’s Lanka. And LordKrishna the first veritable diplomat, for
his extraordinary role in Mahabharata.Much later, in more authentic historical
times, Chanakya gave India, and theworld perhaps, the first treatise on
statecraft, foreign policy and diplomacy,by way of his Arthashastra. The
ancient Indian and Chinesewritings are widely acknowledged as giving much
thought for the management ofrelations between peoples and states.
We
do not have much accounts of foreign policy trendsand practices in Indiain
later years. Even the Great Moghuls were largely content ruling over Hindustan,
with only limited initiatives from their sideto reach out beyond their reigns.
On
the other hand, in medieval Europe, political philosophers like Machiavelli,Rousseau,and later Kant, Hegel, and Mill, underlined the
need for rules to regulate the interaction among emergingsovereign nation
states. In those times foreign relations were not supposed tobe for public
consumption.
Foreign
policy, as it is now understood, isa function of the Westphalian system of
modern state, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, originatingfrom the Peace of Westphalia signed
in 1648 in Europe, in which legitimate states were assumed
to correspond to nations,that is, groups of
people united by language and culture, and these nation-statesbecame the
primary institutional agents in an inter-state system of relations.
Internationalrelations became a public concern as well as an important field of
study andresearch only consequent upon the two devastating World Wars. The Wars
revealedto everyone the importance of international relations, but foreign policycontinued
to remain under cover of secrecy.
Meanwhile,
as the Westphalian system wasgaining wider currency globally, India was losing
the attributes of sovereignty and her capacity for anindependent foreign
policy. During the colonial period, imperial Britishinterests prevailed over
Indian interestswhenthe Empire monopolised
India’s external and defencerelations. So, while the Government of British
India had a semi-autonomous Foreign and Political Departmentfrom 1834 onwards,
its primary functions were to deal with the princely states,and to handle
commercial and mercantile interests in the immediate neighborhoodof Indiaand the
Gulf. It was, however, later, a founder member ofboth the League ofNations and
the UnitedNations.
Unwittingly,the
absence of an indigenous foreign policy tradition allowed the Indian
freedommovement to evolve its external perspectives without external baggage.
JawaharlalNehru, later India’s first Prime Minister, and rightly acknowledged
asthe architect of India’s foreign policy - whose essential parameters and
guidingvalues have remained largely unaltered, already refused to choose
between fascism and imperialism,and started saying what India’s foreign policy
would be. From thelate 1920s on, he formulated theCongress stance on international
issues, and the Congress party established a smallforeign department in
1925. As interim Prime Minister, Nehru, in 1946,articulated India'sapproach to
the world, when heexpostulated: “Our general policy is to avoid
entanglement in powerpolitics and not to join any group of powers as against
any other group. We must befriends to both (blocs) and yet not join either.”
This is when in the prevailing Cold War between two heavilyarmed and hostile
camps, each rival superpower stared saying that if you werenot with them you
were against them. It took courage and vision to retain thechoice to judge each
issue on its merits and on how it affected ourenlightened self-interest, rather
thanthat of an alliance. Having fought so hard for our freedom, we were not
aboutto abdicate our independence of judgment to others. Incidentally,the
term Non-Alignment was coined by V Krishna Menon in
his speech at the UN in 1953; Nehrulater used it during his speech in 1954 in Colombo.
The
primary purpose of independent India’s foreign policy was to help enable
thedomestic transformation of Indiafrom a poor and backward society into one
which could offer her people theirbasic needs and an opportunity to achieve
their potential. Nehru delineated the role that foreign policycould play in
achieving this, by striving to create an external environmentwhich would
accelerate capital flows from abroad, increase the use of scienceand
technology, help modernization of India’s infrastructure, ensure
energysecurity, facilitate development and import of hydrocarbon resources,
andimport of natural resources in which India was deficient.Today, too, India’s
principal foreign policyobjectives remain a peaceful environment and strategic
space and autonomy, so asto concentrate on our tasks of integration and nation
building. This necessitates good relations withmajor powers and economies, and
the neighbours.
Several
factors -historical, civilisational, cultural - that are innate to our people’s
genius,as well as current relevant ones like economic, technological, and
demographic,lie behind our foreign policy consensus in shaping it. The
quintessentialstrands of our foreign policy: peacefulco-existence,
non-interference, peaceful resolution of disputes, non-alignment,
anti-colonialism, anti-racism, multilateralism, pluralism,general and complete
disarmament, opposition to all forms of terrorism,extremism and fundamentalism,
pro-development, wider global cooperation in general, andSouth-South
cooperation in particular, and so on, are moored inIndia’s civilisational
beliefs in peace, tolerance, and One World. These have admirably stood the test
of time. India, as an open, inclusive, and responsiblemember of the global
community, believes that durable peace is only possible ina world in which all
are equal stakeholders in prosperity, progress andhappiness. We also propoundedPanchasheela,the
five principles of peaceful co-existence for international relations.
Yet,it
was the end of the bipolar world in 1989, heralding dramatic changes in the
internationallandscape, that opened up new significant opportunities for us,
just as forothers. Nothing endures but change. Change is the process by which
the future invadesour lives. The last twenty odd years have witnessed ahistoric
and fundamental change in the nature of the world situation. Globalisation,
growinginterdependence, and the emergence of transnational challenges have
beenshaping the international relations like never before, with the
repercussionsand consequences accentuated by the unprecedented connectivity.
Most changesare evolutionary and essentially positive, but some of the positive
forces ofglobalization, like evolution of technology and mobility of capital,
have also,paradoxically, catalyzed and aggravated some of our major global
threats, liketerrorism, extremism, and drugs crimes, environmental degradation,
andproliferation of weapons of mass destruction, including from non-state
actors.Among other persisting dangers and pitfalls are poverty, trafficking,
and cybercrimes.
Thechallenges
have grown more complex and multi-dimensional. Being global innature, they defy
isolated efforts, and require global solutions. Recent years bear witnessthat
these cannot be handled effectively or properly by a single country,however
mighty or resourceful or influential it might be. Besides the global
economiccrisis of the recent years, the situations in Iraq, Afghanistan,
Pakistan, andSyria, the Iran and North Korea nuclear challenges, the natural
calamities asin Japan, the phenomenon of terrorism epitomised by organisations
like AlQaida, Talibans, and Lashkar-e-Taiba, the radicalisation of societies in
thename of religion, and the long-drawn turmoils in the Middle East, all
demonstratethis fact most emphatically.
Securityin
today’s world is now indivisible, warranting a win-win approach rather
thanseeking a zero-sum game. Theprocess has fomented global power
redistribution, giving rise to major newplayers, and considerable diminution of
the risks of direct conflicts amongmajor powers.
Equally,
the pursuit of developmentand prosperity requires collective international
effort. Today, and in theforeseeable future, the issues that will be crucial
for example to India’s transformationare global, requiring global solutions.
These issues of the future, such as concerning food, water, energy,
rawmaterials, climate change, global trade, and international migration, and
demands for fairglobalisation equitably benefitting all, are interlinked,
cross-boundary issues. India isactively, urgently, and constructively engaged
in addressing these, in closeconsultation and cooperation with the
international community.
Thus
the true realisation of ourforeign policy potential had to wait for the end of
the Cold War in 1989, when inthe wake of our economic problems we also launched
our reformpolicies, opening up our economy to the world. The demise of
thebipolar world political system required India to reassess her foreignpolicy
and adjust her foreign relations. The end of the Cold War had gutted thecore
meaning of nonalignment, and the disintegration of the Soviet Unionremoved much
of India'sinternational leverage. But the new circumstances were propitious for
India to improve her relations with the United States, West Europe, and Japan,
amongothers. The strength of capital and trade flows was directlybeneficial to
emerging economies like India. This opened for us new opportunities, by
increasingour strategic space, and our decision-making autonomy on issues of
importanceto us, and thereby to advance our imperative foreign policy objectives.
We
had arrived at a most favorablejuncture in our quest to develop India, with a
remarkable change in the scale of our ambitions,and in our capacity to seek to
achieve them. The ongoing UN reformsprocess, on the global agenda with
Indian initiative, shows a clear greaterwillingness to give a place to Indiaon
the global high table. On trade and economic issues, Indian objections areno
more overlooked easily. On climate change related issues, we have been ableto
build a broad support for our position. The developing countries follow ourlead
and the developed countries seek our counsel and cooperation. In otherwords,
Indiahas emerged as a major voice in global decision-making and management, and
as abridge and balancing power in the emerging global strategic architecture.
Inthat sense, the spirit and purpose of the non-alignment, the solidarity of
thedeveloping countries of the South, and Nehru’s inspiring vision, are
stillalive and an integral continuing part of our agenda. Our foreign policy
anddiplomacy, to that extent, have yielded results in safeguarding and
furtheringour national interests. Our diplomats live up to the expectations
andconfidence reposed in them, and are widely recognized as among the most
capableglobally.
Ourlongstanding
commitment to disarmament, non-proliferation, and internationalsecurity is
widely acknowledged. Time and again we reached out swiftly to ourneighbours,
and to others in distress, such as to Maldivesin the Eighties, and after the
Indian Oceantsunami of 2004. Indiachampions the interests of the countries of
the South in forums like G-8, G-20,G-24, UN, IMF and World Bank, WTO, and at
international conclaves like theclimate meets. Indiahas demonstrated her
ability to contribute to peace and security in the regionand beyond, as also,
conclusively, that substantive social and economicprogress is possible through
true democratic governance.
TodayIndiahas
formal diplomatic relations with most nations, besides being the world'ssecond
most populous country, most-populous democracy, and ninth largesteconomy by
nominal rates and fourth largest by purchasing power parity and oneof the
fastest growing.Though Indiais not
in any major military alliance, our relations with the major powers including
withthe European Union, have acquired strategic depth and self-sustaining
mutualityof interest.
Ourrelations
with the USAtoday, predicated as much on mutual benefit as on its global
significance, arein a phase of unprecedented improvement; leaders on both sides
have describedthem as natural partners, and a defining relationship of the
century. Yet,the challenges remain for better management of relations,
given the differentgeo-strategic and economic contexts, and occasional
differences of the perspectives.
Simultaneously,India’s
foreign policy hasconserved its very close strategic relationship with Russia,
further extending ourhistorical cooperation in defence, trade, information
technology, diamonds,energy including nuclear energy, and science &
technology. Our common fightagainst terrorism is a particular element of
strength in it.
Normally
theneighbours ought to be regarded as natural cooperation partners, but
theunrelenting logic of geography and the innate difficulties borne of
immediateproximity, simultaneously, often pose testing diplomatic
challenges.Neighbourhood is also where domestic and foreign policies become
interwoven,oftentimes inextricably so, and warrant cautious sensitivity. The
truism thatone cannot choose one’s neighbours is all the more true for India,
given thegeographical distinctiveness of the Sub-continent, and the shared ethnicities,cultural
evolution, and historical experiences.
In
our neighbourhood policy approach, India is a factor for stabilityand peace in
the region, and our effort has been to construct an overarching visionfor South
Asia, formulating policies directed at developing friendly andcooperative
relations with all our neighbours, on the basis of sovereignequality and mutual
respect, promoting inter-dependencewith them, creating stakes in each other’s
stability, and developingcross-border infrastructure and other links and
connectivity at all levels. We are cognizant of India’s greaterresponsibility
in this process as the largest country in the region and itsstrongest economy.
Our high economic growth impacts the region, offeringincreased opportunities to
our neighbors to benefit by partnering India. Wecontinue to make unilateral
gestures and extend economic and other concessions,as in the free markets that
Indiahas established with Sri Lanka,Nepal and Bhutan. Similararrangements are
also feasible with our other neighbours, as well as for Indianinvestments in
building and upgrading cross-border infrastructure with each oneof them.
At
the sametime, we do expect that our neighbours would demonstrate sensitivity to
ourvital concerns, relating to use of their territories for cross-border
terrorismand hostile activity against Indiafor example by insurgent and
secessionist groups. As countries engage ineconomic cooperation, we must create
a positive and constructive environment byavoiding hostile propaganda and
intemperate statements.
Recent
decades have witnessed particularlysignificant advances in regard of these,
and, our diplomatic efforts to meet the challengesconfronting us have been
largely successful. For example, we succeeded inexposing Pakistan’s nefarious
designs, including sponsorship of terrorism, useof terrorism as an
instrument of statepolicy, trans-national crime and clandestine proliferation
of nuclear weapons,technology, materials and missiles, and placed it all on the
priority list of theglobal agenda. The Kargil War resulted
in a major diplomatic victoryfor India, and several anti-India militant groups
based in Pakistan were labeledas terroristgroups by
the US and EU.
This,
even as we want to solve all outstanding differences with Pakistan amicably and
it is in that spirit thatwe hope to engage Pakistan.Given the complexities of
the relationship, we have advocated a step-by-stepgraduated approach, even as
we conveyed to Pakistan that credible andeffective action by them on our
terrorism related concerns, including theinvestigations and trial in the 26/11
Mumbai terror attack, would be of the greatestsalience. Lately suggestions have
emanated from across the border that there is a change in their thinking, but
so long as importantelements in Pakistan'sestablishment and the Army regard
India as their adversary, therelations between us can scarcely improve
significantly. Yet, we have to engage with Pakistanbecause only then we
can eventually enlarge the rationally thinkingconstituency there. We have to
believe that sooner or later good sense willprevail in the ruling classes of
Pakistan, that instead of being adversariesour cooperation can become win-win,
and that there are opportunities in workingtogether to realize our common
destiny.
WithChinaproblems
remain, but new convergences, such as on climate change and worldtrade
negotiations, are blunting their propensity to cause us discomfiture. Our
efforts to find a solution to the border problem havenot yielded the expected
result, but we must continue to engage them in areas ofdifferences and
outstanding issues. Continued rapid growthof the Indian economy is the best
riposte to the rise of China. Our effort in recent years has been to develop
amulti-faceted relationship with China,even as there will always be both
competition and cooperation between us. There are discussionsin many quarters
about China’srise and its enhanced assertiveness, particularly in the
Asia-Pacific region. Against the backdrop of the continued high growth of
China's economyand capabilities in general, and military strength in
particular, Chinese mediumand long term intentions remain a matter of
speculation. Given the ascendancyof China, our relations withother countries in
South and East Asia, like Japan,South Korea, Vietnam, and Australia, and
greater cooperation andunderstanding with them, assume enhanced importance.
Bhutan
is an importantneighbour with whom we have a multi-dimensional and integrated
relationship,arising from our vital strategic interests. Over the years, our
economiccooperation has been highly successful, most in development of Bhutan’s
vast hydropower potential, with surpluspower exported to India.This is to our
mutual benefit, and has translated into tremendous goodwill in Bhutan.
Thedevelopment of road and rail network, as also a network of cross
bordertransmission lines, all with Indian cooperation, enhance the
accessibility of Bhutan, benefitingthe entire region.
India
and Nepal, as close neighbours, share aunique relationship of friendship and
cooperation, characterised by openborders and deep-rooted people-to-people
contacts of kinship and culture. India has naturally extended support to
thepeople of Nepal in theirpolitical transition to a democratic order, to a
stable, peaceful and prosperousNepal.Nepal’s political system remains fragile
and under strain, and this hastemporarily slowed down our traditionally strong
bilateral relations, but Indiaremains fully prepared to assist Nepal in
whatever way possible and wishes thepeople of Nepal well.
India-SriLanka
relations have undergone a qualitative transformation and are marked by
increasingIndian cooperation across all sectors. Our connectivity isat an all
time high, and, to further consolidate our economic linkages, we havefinalised
a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. India continues to support a
negotiatedpolitical settlement to the ethnic problem in Sri Lanka based on a credible
devolution package within theframework of an undivided Sri Lanka, and thus
encourages an expeditiousnecessary reconciliation and re-integration process of
its Tamil minority intothe country’s mainstream.
Ourlargest
border is with Bangladesh. Theproximity and the porous border pose
problems of insurgency, illegal migration,and others, aggravated by mutual
misunderstandings and misplaced expectations,which are being successfully dealt
with by promoting conditions of acceptanceof each others’ legitimate concerns,
along with widening cooperation across thespectrum for mutual benefit.
With
Afghanistan,in our commitment to assisther in every possible way, India has
provided extensive humanitarian,financial and project assistance, tothe tune of
1.5 billion dollar, responding to her own priority needs, for her
reconstruction, and in building apluralistic and prosperous society, even as
the security situation thereremains a concern to us. Indiaregards this as
crucial for regional peace and stability and views herrelationship with
Afghanistanas direct and bilateral.
WithMyanmar,
neighbouring ouroccasionally troubled eastern region infested with sporadically
violentinsurgency, a cooperative relationship is being steadily built around
acommitment to stabilize the area, in economic projects, and creating
multi-modaltransport links extending to Thailandand beyond.
Relationsbetween
India and Maldives remainclose and friendly. We supported their historical
democratic transition, and assistMaldives in developing her infrastructure
facilities in key areas like humanresource development, public health care, and
tourism.
TheSouth
Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) for us represents India’s
commitment to the region’s progress andsocio-economic development which can
best be furthered through cooperation inwhich Indiaplays a pivotal role. In
addition, we see the SAARC process of cooperation ascontributing to our goal of
building a peaceful and prosperous periphery. Atthe 14th SAARC Summit that we
hosted in 2007, India made every effort tostrengthen SAARC, moving it from a
declaratory to an implementation phase.
OurLook-East
policy has created new opportunities and partnerships in theAsia-Pacific. We
have also strengthened
our political and economic ties withimportant countries across the globe, such
as South Korea, South Africa, Saudi Arabia,Mexico,and Brazil,as well
as with ASEAN, the African Union, the Arab League,and the
Organisation of American States. In addition, new important bonds are being
evolvedand nourished, such as BRICS – with Brazil, Russia, China, and South
Africa, IBSA –
with Brazil and South Africa, RIC- the trilateral initiative with Russia and
China, the India-Africa Summit, andBIMSTEC - cooperation among Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Thailand,Bhutan, and Nepal).Wehave
launched special drives to strengthen trade, economic and technicalcooperation,
with Africa and Latin America inparticular. The strategic importance of the
Indian Ocean,lifeline for our trade, has been increasing. We now chair the
Indian OceanRim-Association for Regional Cooperation (IOR-ARC). This
cooperation, both inthe economic context, and to contain growing threats such
as piracy, is growingwell.
Overthe
years, India’sdevelopment cooperation and partnership have evolved, from
sporadic and ad hoc aidand technical cooperation, to now as an important
component of our foreignpolicy. These programmes, providing Indian resources,
expertise, andcooperation to other developing countries in a bid to help them
develop faster,also win friends and generate goodwill for the country. Our
partner countries appreciatethat India’scontribution emanates not from a state
of affluence or surplus, is not drivenby any ulterior motives, and is not tied
with conditionalities. Ministry ofExternal Affairs now has a full-fledged
Development Partnership system andmechanism to coordinate and administer all
such Indian cooperation, such as lines ofcredit, and technical cooperation
under India Technical and Economic Cooperation(ITEC) by way of training,
experts, study tours, projects, consultancy, and disasterrelief and
humanitarian assistance, to some 160 countries around the world, allin a spirit
of partnership, interdependence, and mutual benefit. Total Indiandevelopment
cooperation currently measures up annually to well exceeding one billiondollar.
Amost
notable Indian foreign policy success was the landmark agreement firstwith the
US and subsequently with several other major countries enabling us toaccess
nuclear power technology, materials and research, in waiver from the
InternationalAtomic Energy Agency (IAEA), thus effectively ending the sanctions
regime wewere operating under, and opening doors for also receiving sensitive
and dual-usetechnologes and materials for peaceful applications. This is
particularlyinstructive, for when in 1974 we tested a peaceful nuclear
explosive device,the world, led by the nuclear weapon states, reacted by
forming a nuclearcartel, the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), and by cutting off
nuclearcooperation with India unless we agreed to forego our nuclear programme
and putall our nuclear facilities under international safeguards to guarantee
thatcommitment. As the nuclear weapon states were not willing to do so
themselves, andwe could not afford to brook consequent strategic insecurity, we
refused to comply,suffering the consequences for our growth and development. In
contrast, in thewake of our 1998 Pokharan-II nuclear tests, the world opinion,
after itsinitial knee-jerk reaction, eventually, within a short period of ten
years, cameabout to the NSG and IAEA deciding in September 2008 to permit
internationalcivil nuclear cooperation with India,thus ending India’snuclear
isolation.
Yet,
India’s commitment to general andcomplete nuclear disarmament has remained as
firm as ever. We have only refusedto be subjected to arbitrary discrimination
starting with the 1968 NuclearNon-Proliferation Treaty and continuing with the
1996 Comprehensive Test BanTreaty. Arms limitation anddisarmament through
proper multilateral negotiation has been central to India’s worldview, as also
freely permitting peaceful uses of nuclear technologies. India continuesto
stress for a cooperative thrust to reduce the salience of nuclear weapons.
India is theonly country to commit to no-first-use.
Partlythanks
to our initiatives and efforts, terrorism and proliferation of weaponsof mass
destruction (WMDs) have been high on the global agenda. Internationalterrorism
remains a major threat to peace and stability. The results, in theform of
terrorism, clandestine nuclear proliferation, extremism and radicalismare felt
not just by Indiabut by the world. The nexus between terrorism and weapons of
mass destruction canbe frightening. Some of these countries not only have
links withterrorism, but also avowed policies to change the status quo through
force orresort to nuclear blackmail. These issues are of particular concern to
India becausethe beehive, the epicentre of all these activities is right in
ourneighbourhood. In the global war against terrorism, there can be no room
fordouble standards, of distinction between terrorism that cannot be tolerated
andterrorism requiring resolution of its root causes. Some progress has been
madein strengthening global cooperation in the field of counter
terrorism.
Meanwhile,as
I mentioned before, the global governance has remained inadequate,ineffective,
and not far-sighted and visionary enough, not keeping pace withthe evolving
contemporary realities. Although we love the idea of choice, we seekrefuge in
the familiar and the comfortable. Though we have a global economy of sorts,
theglobal polity does not represent the hopes, fears and aspirations of
themajority of the world’s people. In an increasingly connected and
inter-dependent world, the managementof the global diversity requires the
application of principles of democracy,pluralism, inclusiveness, cooperation,
and tolerance.
India,
a founding member ofthe UN even before our Independence,has a steadfast
commitment to the UN and its lofty objectives all along playing a most active
andconstructive role in the UN system. India has been a regular andamong the
largest contributors to the UN peacekeeping operations in hot-spotsaround the
world. We firmly believe in the urgent need for the UN to bestrengthened, by
greater transparency, equity, democratic representation in itsdecision-making;
and for its most fundamental objectives to safeguard peace andsecurity, the UN
Security Council must be expanded in both permanent andnon-permanent
categories. Indiahas offered herself for a new added permanent member, on the
basis of herindisputable credentials. This has already been publiclysupported
by a very large number of member-countries of the UN, including USA, UK,
France,and Russia, all permanent members, as well as Germany, Japan,and
Brazil.
Inour
new emerging world, there are several new significant processespropelling the
world towards greater multilateralism and a pluralistic world order. Since
theexpansion of the UNSC is so difficult procedurally, the effect has
beencreation of a number of other processes or structures more in tune with
theday’s reality,accommodating new players who can contribute to solutions to
tomorrow’sproblems. Just as the replacement of G-8 by G-20is a historic event
in recognition of the tectonic shifts in global economicpower balance, its
success should pave the way for a similar remodelling of theglobal political
architecture, akin to a political P-20.
While
themajor responsibility for the global warming and climate change
phenomena,caused by accumulation of green house gasses in the atmosphere, lies
with the advancedcountries, its adverse affects are felt most severely by
developing countrieslike India.Any concept of ‘shared responsibility’ in this
context must include ensuringtheir right to development. What we seek is
equitable burden-sharing, includingaccess to clean technologies as global
public goods by developing countries,and collaborative R&D and sharing of
their results.
As
many as 30 million people of Indianorigin, the Indian Diaspora, live and work
abroad. They constitute an important link with the mother country. They
make creditablecontributions to the countries that they live in, and also to
India with theirresources and remittances - the largest in the world,
entrepreneurship andtechnological skills, and goodwill. Animportant role
of India'sforeign policy has been to ensure their welfare and well being within
theframework of the laws of their host countries. They are an important aspect
of theresponsibility of our diplomatic missions. In times to come, India will
bethe largest contributor to the world’s workforce, around 136 million
peopleover the next ten years. We already issue over 5 million passports
annually. Indianinvestments and business are today creating or protecting a
significant numberof jobs in Europe and America.
Ladies
& Gentlemen,
Letme
bring my presentation to a prolonged pause. Mind it, I am not saying it isthe
conclusion, for as the wit observed, a conclusion is simply the place
wheresomeone got tired of thinking. One faces one’s future with one’s past.
Life isthe art of drawing sufficient conclusions from insufficient premises.
There isunquestionable need to build a new consensus in wider international
relations todeal with a variety of complex challenges. Multilateralism,
democracy, andinclusive participation is the way to go about it. Tolerance,
understanding andacceptance rather than conflict have to be its hallmarks.
India willalways work to build an enabling order, in our neighbourhood,
regionally and globally, based on equity, and in accord with emerging realities.
One of
the hardest things to learn in life is which bridge to cross and which to burn.
We have been reasonably successful in this. The rapid expansion and qualitative
change in India’s foreign policy perspectives that I have concisely mentioned
are also a positive development for international peace and stability. As new
trans-national challenges emerge, India,with her unique blend of ‘hard’ and
‘soft’ power, would be an indispensable player in strengthening peace, stability
and prosperity in the region and indeed in the world.
I do
hope you would find some useful food for your own thinking in what I had to say.
I extend to you all my best wishes for a happy and fruitful time here at IIT
Mandi, and great accomplishments in life.
Mandi
25
February 2014.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments