They also said that the two regions plunder there resources but in 1956 Telangana including Hyderabad have a power supply of about 17 villages but in Rayalaseema 178 Andhra 328+ villages have power.Now the demand of Hyderabad alone is 1500+ MW.
In comparison with the Rayalaseema region, the SKC remarked that "Thus, on the whole, it would appear that the deprived region is Rayalaseema not Telangana" (2.15.03 on Page 119)
The interesting thing behind this above observation is that holding CM post does not adds advantage to that region. Rayalaseema region leaders hold CM post more days than other region in AP.
There had a discussion on IIT in AP assembly whether to establish it in BASARA or in Hyderabad both are in Telangana region but not Guntur Vizag or Tirupathi because they had thought on that day that Hyderabad is a part of there own state but not to any region.
So called people said that its not possible to established in Andhra region because of lack of infra structure. Why dont they consider this issue when they hold underdevelopment card on there favour.
The IIT's Roorkee, Mandi, Rupnagar,Kharagpur,Kanpur,Indore,Guwathi is not in there capital cities but in a unknown place.
One very important person behind this entire episode always trying to corner the issue to raise more and more by using some abuse words with a great justification as there culture (I don't want to give his name).If so, Is his supporters and himself ready to criticize on the same way by other in there culture?It is so better for him to change his attitude at lest now.
In spite of all this why no one is serious to discuss on Srikrishna Committee report and find amicable solution on the floor of AP Assembly and Indian Parliament.